Plants · Production · Heavy industry
Give every plant a clearer path from finding to improvement.
A machine-guarding concern, a recurring near miss or an unresolved inspection finding should lead to an owned action and evidence of what changed.
ASIP brings covered safety, inspection, risk and corrective-action workflows together so plant teams can do the work in one system and leaders can review the context behind the summary.
An illustrative workflow, not a customer result
From the first observation to the next decision
Capture the condition.
Record the machine-guarding or work-cell concern with the relevant procedure and supporting evidence.
Act on the control, not just the person.
Investigate where needed, assign the appropriate engineering or operating action and retain evidence of the authorized response.
Verify and reuse the evidence.
Review the result and recurrence, then use relevant records in management reviews and approved audits without treating different standards as interchangeable.
Follow the concern beyond the report.
Capture the condition, review the relevant procedure and investigate when needed. Assign an action, retain its evidence and verify the result through the appropriate authorized process.
The aim is to understand and improve the work, not default to blaming or repeatedly retraining an individual without examining the control.
Reuse evidence without pretending every audit is the same.
Quality, environmental and safety management reviews may need overlapping documents, findings and actions. Keep those records traceable and use your approved audit templates for the relevant purpose.
A shared evidence base can reduce repeated collection. It does not make the requirements of different standards interchangeable or confer certification on your organization.
Help local and group leaders see what needs support.
Plant managers can review outstanding work. Authorized group leaders can inspect relevant site records and compare the evidence behind the questions they are asking.
AI assistance helps find information and prepare work for review. Specialist production, quality, maintenance and process-safety decisions remain with the people and systems responsible for them.
Replace what the evidence supports.
Evaluate checklist, hazard-reporting, training-record and action-tracking tools against demonstrated ASIP coverage. Review SDS and chemical workflows separately. Any accepted lockout/tagout workflow records authorized steps; it does not physically isolate machinery or replace locks and verification.
Know the likely price before a call: choose Manufacturing, covered employees and sites to see the band, included locations and any extras.
Replace covered work, not your responsibilities
- Evaluate replacing
- Covered inspection, hazard-reporting, training-record and corrective-action tools. Repeated assurance evidence collection where approved audit templates and access meet the intended scope.
- Keep specialist authority
- MES, CMMS, production/quality systems, process-safety engineering and physical machine controls. Validated QMS functions and certification decisions; specialist chemical services until the actual SDS/HazCom workflow is accepted.
- Current readiness and limits
- Demonstrate the plant's configured workflow and entitlements. LOTO recording exists on phone and desktop, with specific follow-ups and handset proof still owed; it does not physically isolate machinery. Confined Space remains paused and unmerged. General inspections are not physical guarding or a validated QMS. Complete HazCom replacement needs its own acceptance.
Count a retired subscription only after the replacement is accepted and the cost can stop. Measure recovered administrative capacity separately from cash savings, and include migration, retention and overlapping contracts.
What it costs, and what changes it
Manufacturing
From $100/month or $1,000 annual prepaid
Published starting band: 1–10 covered employees, 1 site included. USD.
Your employee band and site count determine the total, without individually purchased user seats. The calculator shows included sites, extra-site charges and monthly versus annual-prepaid totals. Enterprise is separately scoped from its published annual floor.
Available modules and implementation, migration, training, support, taxes and additional-product charges must be confirmed for your scope. A module name is not a promise that every developing workflow is available.
See your price without contact detailsQuestions before you switch
- Can the same evidence support several management-system reviews?
- Relevant records can be reused with the appropriate approved templates and scope. Different standards keep their own requirements; shared evidence does not confer ISO certification.
- Does ASIP replace production, maintenance or energy-isolation systems?
- Not by implication. Retain MES, CMMS, technical process-safety systems and physical controls outside the demonstrated replacement scope. Any accepted LOTO workflow records authorized steps; software does not isolate machinery or replace physical locks and verification.
- How is manufacturing pricing calculated?
- Choose Manufacturing, covered employee headcount and sites. The calculator uses the corresponding employee band, included locations and any additional-site charges.